• Home
  • The Class
  • The Book
  • The Author
  • Reflections
  • Contact

big bang theory

Astronomy—Theology—Evolution

Posted on April 25, 2016 Leave a Comment
Image credit: www.toonpool.com
Image credit: www.toonpool.com

“It ain’t what you don’t know that gets you into trouble. It’s what you know for sure that just ain’t so.” - Mark Twain

This is a wonderfully interconnected triad that gifted naturalist Annie Dillard would regard as a “bright snarl.” Without a Creator there would be no “astronomy” or evolution. Without evolution the universe would be oxymoronically stuck in the first nanosecond, before time began, with no cosmos. And with no cosmos, humans would not have evolved with the ability to contemplate the works of the Creator.

Two gifted writers have properly suggested that “Mystery” reigns supreme and only egoism and arrogance motivate scientists and theologians to assume that they have all relevant answers. Robert Jastro, former director of the National Aeronautics And Space Administration (“Until The Sun Dies,” and “God and the Astronomers”) acknowledged the limitations of “The Big Bang Theory:”

“At this moment it seems as though science will never be able to raise the curtain on the mystery of creation. For the scientist who has lived by his faith in the power of reason, the story ends like a bad dream. He has scaled the mountains of ignorance; he is about to conquer the highest peak; as he pulls himself over the final rock, he is greeted by a band of theologians who have been sitting there for centuries.”

Jastro was a self-described agnostic, yet he used candor and levity to describe the inadequacy of his own thought process.

In an equally terse self-analysis, Fr. Robert Capon, “Hunting The Divine Fox stated:”

“Theology therefore is fun. The inveterate temptation to make something earnest out of it must be steadfastly resisted. We were told quite plainly that unless we became as little children, we could not enter the kingdom of heaven, and nowhere more than in theology do we need to take this message to heart.”

The “Big Bang,” the origin of life and the eventual evolution of human beings remain three of the great, unsolved mysteries of planet Earth. Anthropologist Loren Eiseley concluded his work, The Immense Journey with:

“Rather, I would say that if “dead” matter has reared up this curious landscape of fiddling crickets, song sparrows and wondering men, it must be plain even to the most devoted materialist that the matter of which he speaks contains amazing, if not dreadful powers, and may not impossibly be, as Hardy has suggested, ‘but one mask of many worn by the Great Face behind.’”

Lowell H. Young
Author: Biodesign Out For A Walk

www.facebook.com/biodesignoutforawalk
www.biodesignoutforawalk.com
www.linkedin.com/LowellYoung
www.goodreads.com/BiodesignOutForAWalk

Posted in: Reflections | Tagged: Author Lowell Harrison Young, big bang theory, Bio-spirituality, Biodesign Out For A Walk, evolution, existence of God, faith, intelligent design, Loren Eiseley, mystery of life, Theology

It’s About Time

Posted on December 7, 2014 Leave a Comment

Father TimeWarning! Readers of this post are likely to experience a severe brain cramp!

Excerpt: Biodesign Out For A Walk, Chap. 10, Matthew I.

Unbeknown to me, a quiet, thoughtful Latina girl went to church the following Sunday. After the service, she approached her priest and asked, “Father, if God made the universe, what made God?” The priest’s face turned red, and he stooped down and whispered sharply in her ear, “We don’t ask questions like that!”

The pope once asked Stephen Hawking not to try to inquire about what happened before the big bang, and Hawking agreed. Not because he wanted to comply with the pope’s wishes, but because it is fundamentally impossible to find out something that happened before the literal beginning of time. As St. Augustine pointed out, “there was no ‘then’; when there was no time.”

Circa 400 AD, Augustine of Hippo formulated the first known version of the “Big Bang” theory. There may be no “scientific” proof for the existence of God, but 1600 years later, scientists have not been able to refute his theory. In fact, excepting the cause, it aligns well with the currently accepted “Big Bang” theory.

I suspect that this will be the most extraordinary blog-post I will ever write and, as usual, it involves someone else’s thinking process. I am not being self-deprecating, it’s just that many of the world’s greatest minds are far more intelligent than I.

This includes a pantheon of scholars including Bishop Augustine of Hippo. In 397 he wrote, Confessions: in thirteen books, which, according to some scholars, is the greatest collection of books other than the Holy Bible. It had a profound impact on the evolution of Christianity and Western philosophy, ergo Western Civilization. In a wonderful synchronicity, I found Eric Rosenfield’s post on-line:

http://www.ericrosenfield.com/time.html

“In 1917, Albert Einstein completed work on the General Theory of Relativity, one of the rules of which states that time is fundamentally bound to matter and gravity, and that without matter there would be no time. Oddly, this concept was presaged almost 1,300 years before that when Bishop Augustine of Hippo (later St. Augustine) put forth the idea that when God created the Heavens and the Earth, he created time itself as well. Before Augustine, no one that we know of had tried to consider “time” as being something changeable, something that could start and stop; after all, we always perceive time as moving forward, and contemplating temporality as being finite or malleable seems unnatural, and the implications headache­-rousing. Plato and Aristotle both regarded time as being infinite. Yet it was Augustine’s application of the methods of the principles of Grecian philosophy and reason to the Christian concept of God that forced him to arrive at his conclusions…”

But then, what’s really strange about Augustine’s interpretation of the eternal nature of the Beginning is that, when taken entirely apart from the Bible, it resonates not only with Relativity (Augustine saying that for the World to happen in time there must have been something that experiences time being roughly analogous to Einstein saying that matter and time are linked, and without one you would not have the other) but also with modern Big Bang Theory. Briefly, according to Big Bang Theory, because matter and time are so inextricably bound, when all the matter in the universe was compressed into a single point it formed what’s called a “quantum singularity” in which, the math shows, the curvature of time and space became infinite. This means the Big Bang singularity exists at all times at once, in all places at once much like Augustine’s God - ­ the singularity that created the universe is all around us, all the time, forever. Of course, it’s not a perfect correlation, since whether a quantum singularity wants to offer us salvation through its divine grace, like Augustine’s God, is another question entirely.

Moving forward in Book 11, Augustine then asks, “What exactly is time?” and says, somewhat comically, “If no one asks me, I know what it is.” We know that time, he states, has three parts – the past, the present and the future. And yet, we also know that the past and future don’t actually exist, since we can in no way interact with them except when they are the present. That is to say, if the past and the future exist in the physical way that the present does, we have no way of knowing it, because we only experience the present. And yet, if the past and future don’t exist, then what exactly are we measuring when we measure time? Obviously, time itself exists, since it can be measured, and yet if we say something is a hundred years ago, what exactly is that hundred years ago when it is past and therefore doesn’t exist at all? And since the present must become past in order to be time (otherwise, it would be eternity), then if “time present — ­­ if it be time — ­­ comes into existence only because it passes into time past, how can we say that even this is, since the cause of its being is that it will cease to be? Thus, can we not truly say that time is only as it tends toward nonbeing?” He then tries to further examine what exactly is meant by the term “present”, since the present cannot be broken down and examined – is the present a second, a nanosecond, less than a nanosecond? In truth the present has no length at all, it can only be measured as it passes from future into past – two states that do not actually exist – and therefore, can it be said that the present actually exists at all?”

In a devilishly humorous irony, in his book, The Great Design, Stephen Hawking proceeded to claim that believing in God has become obsolete because the universe is so complex that it created itself out of NOTHING! Imagine that. Hawking has egotistically assumed that he is smarter than God ergo; God must be obsolete.

So, 1600 years ago, Bishop Augustine proposed a theory that is just as plausible today as anything science has to offer. The fact that he chose to name the Great Mystery “God” and Stephen Hawking chose to name it “nothingness” suggests that Moses was correct when he wrote, 3500 years ago, that man has been endowed with the awesome privilege of “free will”.

According to the “Big Bang Theory”, the universe is 13.8 billion years old, there are 100 billion galaxies in the known universe, the earth is 4.5 billion years old and there are 7 billion people living on our planet. So, what are the odds of us being here at this precise moment?

Lowell H. Young, Author: Biodesign Out For A Walk

Posted in: Reflections | Tagged: Author Lowell Harrison Young, beginning of time, big bang theory, evolution, existence of God, St. Augustine

Biodesign: Yin-Yang and Evolution

Posted on July 1, 2013 Leave a Comment

yin yang evolutionIt is possible that the ultimate example of the Taoist concept of yin and yang may be contemporary science and religion. Yin and yang are actually complementary, not opposing, forces, interacting to form a whole greater than either separate part; in effect, a dynamic system. Everything has both yin and yang aspects, (for instance shadow cannot exist without light). The sigmoid wall that separates science and religion is necessarily impenetrable. Science depends on facts (as we perceive them) that can be predicted and reproduced. Religion depends on faith that can not be predicted or reproduced. There are times, however, when transitory chinks appear that allow peeks through the wall. Backpackers camping on a high mountain peak on a crisp, clear, night are often treated to a cosmic display that evokes wonder, awe, and perhaps contemplation. Somehow the out-dated “steady-state” theory (“the universe was always there”) seems soul-less, empty, insipid. So, if the “red-shift theory” is correct, and there was a universal creative event, who (or what) made the trans-galactic view? Even though it is not “scientifically correct” to ascribe the creative event to a Supreme Being, can scientists not theorize that the event was caused by a being, power or process that is beyond human comprehension? The sigmoid wall, of the yin and yang of creation and evolution, is much more permeable. Assuming the mountain-top view was created, we also know that it has evolved, and will continue to do so. In fact, what we are seeing does not really exist. The light from stars long gone is still reaching us. The light from newly created stars may not reach Earth for several million years.

It is now clear that the continents on Earth are “drifting,” mountains are being formed and eroded, deserts have come and gone. The Earth was mysteriously created and now is evolving.

The evolutionary history of life, although not complete, suggests that life began at the prokaryote level and has progressed to Blue Whale, Sequoia, nuclear physicist and opera diva. However, just as new stars are being formed, new life forms (even species) are being created. Gregor Mendel and Luther Burbank formed the sciences of theoretical and applied genetics and modern scientists can now “create” modified life forms that previously did not exist.

Perhaps we are finally at the level of intellectual maturity where we can stop bickering and celebrate the synthesis of “Creavolution.” After all, creation and evolution simply can not exist without each other. Every creative event evolves and all evolution begins with a creative event.

Stalwart proponents of one discipline, at the exclusion of the other, are like school-yard children shouting, “Does so!” “Does not!” *

Posted in: Reflections | Tagged: big bang theory, evolution, yin yang

Recent Posts

  • Darwin’s Dilemma—Spiritual Gifts Part II
  • Darwin—Mozart—Sunny Choi—Spiritual Gifts
  • Sasha The Potter and the Decline of Democracy in the US
  • Dewitt Jones: “The Banquet Is Laid Though Nobody Comes.”
  • Sisyphus-Half Dome-The Superior Female Brain

Bio-Words

4th of July Advanced Biology Albert Einstein Amazing Grace Author Lowell Harrison Young big bang theory Bio-spirituality bio-spirituality. freedom of religion Biodesign Biodesign class Biodesign Out For A Walk Charles Darwin Darwinism evolution existence of God faith freedom of religion Grand Canyon Half Dome Half Dome climbers Henry David Thoreau intelligent design John Muir John Muir vision Loren Eiseley love love lessons Lowell Harrison Young marriage Maya Angelou Mendocino Merry Christmas miracle of life mystery of life Native Americans soul soul medicine spiritual growth spirituality spiritual origin of music synchronisities the origin of life Yosemite Yosemite Temple Yosemite Valley

Copyright © 2017 .

Theme by ThemeHall.